Peering through the fog - Page 2 - PUA Forums - The UK's Leading Pick-up Artist Forum

piers147 · 30-06-2011, 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kowalski

The jacket. That isn't real. He isn't Roger Federrer, no one is. That isn't a real person you are seeing, it is a strange act. He is probably so lost in it by now though that he can't tell the difference himself. Just like Tom Cruise. If Federrer became a Scientologist, I wouldn't find it especially surprising.

Also, prefer when he stays in, so Nadal can beat him whilst at the same time calling him the greatest player who ever lived. Funny.

Peace,

kowalski

This i cant belive what in reading !!!.

Federer is not acting with 16 grand slams has beaten records galore he is up there with ali, armstrong, jordon as one of the most talented sports men ever!!

He speaks four different languages and has great humilty and in my eyes is for someone that is so succesful tremendously humble and authentic you talk nonsence a lot of you guys on this site could learn from him .

I agree tom cruise is a complete twat with that ufo religion

To conclue my agrument a intresing story about blake commented about when he was out injured for like a year with a very serious injury no playerscrang to ask how he is or txt nothing!!! .

The only player that did was federer he rang and asked how he was that is the measure of the man he is not fake.

Refl3x · 30-06-2011, 11:07 AM

Quote:

no one is the waiter. There are no dialler managers, I am not one. No one can be a dialler manager.

best spoken out loud with the Twilight Zone music playing!

I AM NOT A NUMBER I AM A FREE MAN!!!

30-06-2011, 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kowalski

The jacket. That isn't real. He isn't Roger Federrer, no one is. That isn't a real person you are seeing, it is a strange act. He is probably so lost in it by now though that he can't tell the difference himself. Just like Tom Cruise. If Federrer became a Scientologist, I wouldn't find it especially surprising.

Also, prefer when he stays in, so Nadal can beat him whilst at the same time calling him the greatest player who ever lived. Funny.

Peace,

kowalski

But you have also only seen him "at work"?

Unless you have met him in person and know what he is like, the "real" him, then I stand corrected.

RLAJay · 30-06-2011, 11:56 AM

I dunno K.. Still don't see it I'm afraid.

Tom Cruise I absolutely understand. The guy is a nutjob as well as a fake... Federer however I picture as just as humble and nice as a regular guy who's never played tennis too.

Refl3x · 30-06-2011, 01:36 PM

What about Tiger Woods?

piers147 · 30-06-2011, 04:24 PM

It would be intresting K if you were born with federer's talent how would you handle it?

Would the unlimited adulation have a effect why of cause as for the persona of federer he seems very articulate sound minded a family man with deceny a good marriege chidren.

As for the white jacket hell i would wear it for millions of dollors no problem i think that he should retire now as nadal has his number no dout about that.

I think he's just fullfilling his contract with nike otherwise i think he would quit.

Also he is a prime example how to conduct your self when playing the sport and his behaviour his always classy many sportsmen especailly the footballer's that take drugs cheat have no class they should look at federer behaviour and take note.

I think you may be jealous !! any person that has class fiona bruce they should be a item hee.

01-07-2011, 08:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kowalski

That isn't a real person you are seeing, it is a strange act. He is probably so lost in it by now though that he can't tell the difference himself. Just like Tom Cruise. If Federrer became a Scientologist, I wouldn't find it especially surprising.

How can you judge what he is like, if you also have only seen him at work?

Quote:

Originally Posted by kowalski

How good he is at tennis, how many languages he speaks, how nice he comes across is irrelevant.

Nobody is Roger Federer ........
He is playing a role, the role of Roger Federer - a la Tom Cruise.

His character is super-nice, but still a character. It is hard to get this across if you can't see it. Just concentrate on the jacket for a bit. It isn't real, no one is the jacket guy. (In fairness we only ever see him at work, whenever you see him he knows he is at work.)

How do you know that it is just a "character" and not his real personality projecting through at work? Why is he "playing the role"? How do you know he is different at home?

Also, you are right that I overlooked (In fairness we only ever see him at work, whenever you see him he knows he is at work.)
, but I did read all the posts in this thread (just quickly skimming when I was at work)

PostScript · 01-07-2011, 10:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kowalski

Well there are other things we can't not be, animal things. He is an animal too, none of us are above that. We sweat and shit and bleed and cry and die and anyone who seems like they have got it in control is repressing a lot of stuff. I don't think the ultimate human is blankly logical and emotionally stable (that makes me feel queasy), the ultimate human is animal too.

One of the best things I have read on the forum, especially as relates to me and where I'm at presently.

PS

Refl3x · 01-07-2011, 10:07 AM

the phrase 'Im only Human' exemplifies we are an imperfect thing

piers147 · 01-07-2011, 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kowalski

I'm judging all this based on the limits of what it is to be human. Like when Jay was saying that he never judges on appearance and the discussion lead to an understanding that he does, everyone does, we can't not.

Well there are other things we can't not be, animal things. He is an animal too, none of us are above that. We sweat and shit and bleed and cry and die and anyone who seems like they have got it in control is repressing a lot of stuff. I don't think the ultimate human is blankly logical and emotionally stable (that makes me feel queasy), the ultimate human is animal too.

I don't know that he is different at home. Maybe, as I said before, he has bought into it now so much he thinks that is who he is, or maybe he just keeps up the act all the time. Who knows. He isn't who we see though, because no one is that. No one can be that, because it is not human, and anyone who is acting that is doing it for a reason and there is something else, real, trapped inside that reason.

Peace,

kowalski

I will call a stale mate on this Mr K.