Tell me what annoys you about the world? - Page 4 - PUA Forums - The UK's Leading Pick-up Artist Forum

chops147 · 13-04-2011, 09:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kowalski

Wake up.

Here is the deal - you implied murdering innocents is wrong yet you are considering a career where there is a real possibility that you will be instructed to, or be part of the chain of command that issues instruction to, murder innocents in exchange for money.

You fucked up!

Peace,

kowalski

anyone who thinks you can win a war without killing innocents is evading reality.

this happens in war sometimes it's unavoidable

Phenom · 13-04-2011, 09:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chillem

nothing annoys me about the world, whats the point in being annoyed?

get fucked off!

chillem · 14-04-2011, 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phenom

get fucked off!

ta. I wouldn't expect anyone to believe me from one short sentence.

Most of the stuff in the OP is so trivial that being annoyed by it is... well, just so fucking pointless.

One of the things that used to annoy me was when someone would try to blame their own inadequacies on someone else. I'm sure we've all seen this happen in work or whatever. Now I just laugh at them.

Some of the more serious probems in the world. Being annoyed is not going to make an ounce of difference so why let oneself be annoyed?

I know so many people who get annoyed by such trivia that it seems as if they are almost looking for things to be annoyed about. That is not a place I want to be.

chillem · 14-04-2011, 03:54 PM

lol minutes maybe

but why would you want to intentionally annoy someone? I thought you were cooler than that

chops147 · 14-04-2011, 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kowalski

I didn't say 'you can win a war without killing innocents', chops, don't get it twisted.

Peace,

kowalski

I know I was supporting your claim. that comment was meant for madfertit

chillem · 14-04-2011, 05:42 PM

yeah its cool K, I'm more than happy to take advice from anyone. I did say right from the start that I'm here to learn.

Right now at this moment, I'm not annoyed by anything. Maybe I have misunderstood the 'being in the moment' thing, and I'm not being flippant or sarcastic here cos I know I can be sometimes.

I can imagine that there could be times in the future when I could get annoyed. e.g. if a relative or close friend was ill and needed a specific medication but they were denied it, I'm sure that would annoy me, but right now in the moment there is nothing annoying me

Phenom · 14-04-2011, 07:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kowalski

I could annoy the fuck out of you in seconds.
You get annoyed everyday because you are alive and human and normal.

Stop it with the 'holier than thou' bullshit.

Peace,

kowalski

word!!

10char

Mad_Fer_It · 12:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PostScript

But would you be helping people though?

Can you pick and choose where you are deployed: no. You'll be an instrument of policy. An expensively trained and skilled instrument of policy. They're not going to have you hugging Panda's in a white UN jeep, they're going to have you on the ground helping influence a ruckus in some war torn shit hole, so they can manipulate the geopolitics of the region. Policy is not benign. Look at some of the suspicions around 911, look at some of the suspicions around Al Qaeda, look at the lack of WMD, look at how Gaddafi suddenly went from friend to foe, look how 10% world trade goes through Egypt (Suez). There is a pattern, and it's called: power and money.

I'm not being judgemental or having a go, I'm just saying think about it before you come back with your leg blown off, full of resentment about how they lied to you about what you were doing.

PS

wikipedia research derp use long words to add credibility derp derp

I don't think you really know what you're on about. Let me guess, you believe everything that Michael Moore and Reddit tell you?

Quote:

Originally Posted by kowalski

Wake up.

Here is the deal - you implied murdering innocents is wrong yet you are considering a career where there is a real possibility that you will be instructed to, or be part of the chain of command that issues instruction to, murder innocents in exchange for money.

You fucked up!

Peace,

kowalski

derp. Exactly the same as above. There's an obvious difference between 'murder' and then the accidental killing of innocent people in a war situation, that war itself being started with the intention of a freeing a population and saving countless lives. You should show more respect to the armed forces mate, I've met some of them, and they have more balls and dedication than anyone on here - get more women too!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phil

haha i tried to join the RAF when i was younger

i duno if you heard but i used to work with one of the uk largest charities aswell...

and i always thought i was right!! sound similar

Lol don't tell me you failed? 25 press ups and 5 on the bleep test? Different league the RM mate.

RLAJay · 16-04-2011, 01:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mad_Fer_It

wikipedia research derp use long words to add credibility derp derp

I don't think you really know what you're on about. Let me guess, you believe everything that Michael Moore and Reddit tell you?

You fail to address his points here and instead divert using a personal attack. Either address the points or concede them. Don't divert, it won't work here.

Quote:

derp. Exactly the same as above. There's an obvious difference between 'murder' and then the accidental killing of innocent people in a war situation, that war itself being started with the intention of a freeing a population and saving countless lives. You should show more respect to the armed forces mate, I've met some of them, and they have more balls and dedication than anyone on here - get more women too!

You make the assumption here that combatants are black and white, good and bad, right and wrong. What do you do when you're ordered to take out an enemy position defended by 10 year old children? Are they the enemy and bad people or simply innocents that have been manipulated or coerced into the situation?

That war itself wasn't started with the intention of freeing anyone at all, it was started with the "stated" intent of removing him from power due to the near imminent danger of wmds. The stated motivations were 100% non altruistic.

Compare to our current operations in Libya, which ARE about defence of innocent population. Note the extremely different approach, the absolute decisions to not cause ANY civilian casualties because the entire reasoning for being there is about defence of the innocent.

You're being very naive.

Mad_Fer_It · 16-04-2011, 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RLAJay

You fail to address his points here and instead divert using a personal attack. Either address the points or concede them. Don't divert, it won't work here.

You make the assumption here that combatants are black and white, good and bad, right and wrong. What do you do when you're ordered to take out an enemy position defended by 10 year old children? Are they the enemy and bad people or simply innocents that have been manipulated or coerced into the situation?

That war itself wasn't started with the intention of freeing anyone at all, it was started with the "stated" intent of removing him from power due to the near imminent danger of wmds. The stated motivations were 100% non altruistic.

Compare to our current operations in Libya, which ARE about defence of innocent population. Note the extremely different approach, the absolute decisions to not cause ANY civilian casualties because the entire reasoning for being there is about defence of the innocent.

You're being very naive.

tl;dr - i rarely bother with your posts as i always feel that i'm being sold to in some way - no i wont purchase any training thanks

i cba typing more - I'll just disagree happily with kowalski et al

off to the pub for pints and our next step towards a glorious treble - fans of other teams except United, u mad? ye u mad