Leaving out the good vs evil shit.

The first post came across quite arrogant and boastful to me. Look at me I fucked 6 girls in a week and THEN I learnt about pick-up and found it 'quite interesting' (huh?) and you want to know what others 'think' about you.

I don't give a fuck. That's what I think.

ye but maybe u only think thats boastful coz u can't do it.

the shit i got when i first appeared was ridiculous. people 'challenging' me to go on nights out to prove my skills.

as if!

Maybe - however I'm betting this guy doesn't get passed 5 posts, like most newbies. Which if that's the case will confirm my initial thoughts. However if he gets to 4,825 posts, I'm willing to concede he has more to offer.

Although he is claiming to wonder where he stands in this uncertain world (of pua). He seems to be here to have us confirm to him that he is a 100% natural. From reading PUA books and watching vids, surely he's worked out this part already?

u have shagged more than 3 birds.

that means u can shag birds without a book.

pulling girls is natural... thats why nature is happening all around u.

There is no AFC
There is no PUA

Getting knocked back is fine
5 for 5 is a sales tool. if i ask 9 girls out and get 8 numbers .... I'm not shit at pulling coz 1 in the middle said no.

if i ask 9 girls out and get 1 numbers its ok... i got 1 number.

women like men who don't put up with their shit and are willing to tell them to go fuck themselves if they step out of line.

read all the books, do all the stupid shit. pick out what works.

Personally I don't see how ignorance is an excuse.

If he survives his military career, he is going to wake up in 20 years time with nightmares of friends he saw blown to pieces, people he killed, likely have a drink problem to suppress it and finally have the maturity to question why the government really sent him to some dusty shit hole in the first place.

We lionize the military because the alternative is to realise that we are complicit in a load of sketchy shit that allows us to live in comfort. We canonise them with ceremonies and the like to neatly wrap a bow on any further thinking we might otherwise engage in.

It's a bit like religion, at what point do we stop allowing people to believe whatever bollocks they want and actually go "hang on, this is idiotic" without fear of being politically incorrect?

Sounds like he's good at knobbin' birds though, so let's all focus on that

edit: anyway he's probably a troll

I agree with you and I don't think that being a soldier is something to be applauded.

At the same time growing up in a "rougher" military city, it's sad to see that people turn to the armed forces to escape financial and social poverty and poor education which just ends up breeding further poor education and poverty thus ensuring a tragic circle where very few manage to escape the moral minefield so I guess I harbor some twisted sense of sympathy...

I do meditate and I often meditate on whether there is a solution to the barbaric state of the western world.

I agree that action should be taken and we have an obligation to do so, but at the same time there is enough misery caused by the bourgeoise that we shouldn't be beating each other down.

[quote=kowalski;92318]Lol, nope.

I'm not against guards only armies. There's a huge difference between the two both in terms of financial cost and effectiveness. Troops of guardians are crazy cheaper than troops of armies and they are significantly more effective too.[quote=kowalski;92318]

The number of wars on the UK which have been averted merely by the fear of the counter attack...

The cold war stopped a complete world destruction through each party's fear of being attacked. If you have no means to attack and only that to defend you leave yourself open, WIDE OPEN. its not the same as it was when our island was guarded by oceans... they have boats that fly now called airomaplanes.

without an army you can't counter attack! that limits your strategical moves and allows your opposition to easily ascertain what your next move is...

which would be wait to get ass raped again...

and again.

Whatever the story was, its still true that without weapons u can't defend ur self.

Just like the government talking about drugs are a killer, and people injecting weed..

so is hippies talking about shit they know nothing about

There is no evidence to suggest that the OP actually conducts such attrocities other than an admission to being a soldier. I will agree that, in the least, he is complicit in manslaughter but based on his admission to being a soldier alone

Honestly I think your comments went too far, they were just plain insulting to begin with.

The guy posted twice and even tried to engage you which you responded with, what he obviously took (and from my perspective), another insulting post before he responded rather rashly (and aggressively)

There is no proof that he is a murderer other than your assertion/accusation.

I'm not talking about not taking any action but taking positive action.

Calling somebody a cunt isn't positive action, in what way does it improve the situation? Engaging in campaigns, education, protests and petitioning is positive action (plus many other positive options).
Calling somebody a cunt on the internet is petty, is it something you do in real life? do you do it to armed forces personel who are friends/relatives of friends?

For me there is also the question of what would be achieved by calling the OP a cunt? For me he isn't going to stop his armed forces career because some guy on the internet called him a name. Engaging, educating and providing an inspiration/example however are better options. They are more time consuming and not always successful but they have a better success rate than calling somebody a cunt.
Admittedly it's a rather simplistic way of looking at it but is is more simplistic that every soldier = murderer?

How would you suggest we deal with them? I am genuinely interested on any solution you may have. Attaching a social stigma is one way, however I would only be interested in legal methods (methods that are permitted by law as opposed to legal trial)

K, I'm not as intelligent as you, I'm not as well informed psychologically, socialogically or philosophically. Nor do I possess your succint talent for perception and effective writing.

I dont think that war is ok. but there are many ways that wars are commenced. Waging war against another country for resources or revenge imho is never acceptable. But stepping in to stop defenseless slaughter of minorities is still war and I would say we have a moral obligation to defend those who cannot protect themselves.

I do think that people should use dirty words. I think there is a time and a place for all language as it holds particular meaning, relavance and gravity which by using the correct words with appropriate actions we can effectively communicate.

I see 2 sets of victims caused by a corrupt elitist hierarchy:
The people being killed in their homeland under the guise of some war on terror, defense of the righeous bullshit excuse to invade and conquer natural resources in the name of self-defense whilst the invader's corporate pals strip out all of the newly acquired natural resources

The victims of social ills who become soldiers. Suffered from poverty, abuse, poor education, etc. they are "given" a way out by joining the army painted as some fantastic place to be where they'll be respected heroes paid well but actually find themselves getting them or their mates killed trying to evict farmers from oil fields so that some posh etonian can leave an even bigger trust fund to his son tarquin.
They end up burned out at 40 with a drinking problem, PTSD and aggressive tendancies not knowing what to do with their lives believing that they "did the right thing" and "led a good righteous life".

I would like to see a solution where the class system is defeated and would hopefully eradicate both sets of victims, but that would require a leader and some sort of catalystic event to inspire or provoke people into taking action and "revolting", something that would shake them from their consumeristic world of comfort.

What do you think it would take to build a world free from the approach of living to have things? How could it be acheived?

Historical evidence suggests that it is human nature to build empires/countries/states/tribes and that despite many people's best efforts war will always be a part of humanity and that world peace or even states without some form of military power may never be possible.

Again I defer to you as a person more educated in philosophy and psychology as to whether it would even be a possibility to achieve world peace and would that be achieved through any current political system?

I don't have the solution to make it stop though I often wish somebody did. Maybe they do but they can make more money by keeping it quiet

I understand your points and something has to be done about the situation.

I dont think bullying the little people at the bottom is the right course of action. It's similar to shouting abuse a prostitutes because of the sex slave trade.

I like to keep things simple because simple solutions work and for me;
2 wrongs do not make a right.
Life's tough, why make it tougher for each other?
Dont beat each other down
*other simple, cliché phrases

Maybe I'm naive... do you think I'm mental?