Reasoning skills are hard to come by. To reply to Kowalski earlier, as this has shown now, is that I piss about with Duncan because he is mad. He is so mad that to really have a discussion with him would be weak of character to get boner points off debating some mentally insane. He needs help. I believe whether we agree or disagree is beyond influence of someone like him. Dan 30 on the other hand appears almost normal enough for people to take him seriously so I will point out his retardedness. Although retards are harmless, have better logic and definitely better with girls

This may come as good news to many of you, but the ward manager of this mental hospital has asked to see me today, to discuss my ‘postings on the internet’. I fear this will mean I will be banned from appearing here -- at least for several weeks. If so, thanks for putting up with me, and please read my piece if you can … it seems that no-one has, so far. I know nearly all of you think I am mad, but maybe, just maybe you might catch a glimmer of truth in what I say?

Here’s the link once again: men in public places

No.
Damned post size restrictions...

D!ce --- sorry you didn’t like it. I'd be interested to know why, if you had the time to explain.

Everyone --- I have not been banned from the internet, so is there anyone else who has read my ‘presence’ piece? It’s really all about the way men use non-verbal communication techniques to project male dominance in public settings. I think it forms the basis for truly virtuous flirting: flirting that is good for everyone involved -- even disinterested by-standers.

Nope and I don't really plan to. Probably a load of shite anyway

I totally understand & accept the biological truth, that the puberty of both sexes is nature's way of saying the body is primed & ready for sex.

A peado to me is someone who has sexual thoughts or urges whether they act or not, towards young children.

I think it's pretty much acceptable for a male & female to have sex with each other if they've passed puberty stage. Who could really do anything or even has the right to if two 13 year olds have consensual sex with each other?

Oh who the fuck am I kidding I was involved in sexual activity long before I even left primary school & there's me yapping on about it probably being ok for 13 year olds to have sex yet I had my first blow job at about 8

Fuck up Dan

Duncan what are your opinion on this thread

http://www.puaforums.co.uk/off-topic...ak-2013-a.html

Top-hat --- Pity. I am getting some very positive feedback on the Philosophy Now Forum, so I don’t think it can all be a load of shite.

Amit1207 --- Thanks for pointing this thread out. Being an atheist evangelist, I have strong views on religion, particularly the Muslim and Jewish faiths, yet I feel that something positive can be done about them. My recommendation for young UK Muslims, 36% of whom quite unacceptably recommend death for those who leave their faith (2006 Populus Poll), is a Holy Declaration to be hung up in all mosques around the country, signed by the imam. This repudiates all holy texts that contain death threats. You can see a draft on my website Suffrageur Website - Home.

As with Kowalski and others using swear words, I recommend banning Alphamaax from the forum … perhaps for 3 weeks, seeing how long his silly rant lasts. It is crazy to allow such arrant nonsense to clog up the pages of the PUA Forum. We ought to be talking more about the pleasures of picking up girls!

Wouldn't be a lot of point in banning him dude. It's not like he would even be aware of it.

He came on here a year ago, had a dozen or so ridiculously long rants, then fucked off again & hasn't been seen since.