Nobody would really bother too much if someone got married to car & started having sex with the exhaust pipe. They might get a laugh at how fucking weird they are but it would soon be forgotten. If someone expressed their desire to do similar with a child there would be uproar, & rightly so.

What about those who haven't physically acted on their impulses but view child pornography is it ok because they simply have a sexual preference?

If someone wants to fuck a lamppost, fair enough no harm has been done to anyone.

If someone wants to or has fuck a child, terminate them.

That's what I would do if I was in charge.

Child pornography can't be produced without harming a child, and by seeking out and viewing child pornography you are complicit in that, so no that's not.

You seem to have a problem seeing the difference between a thought/desire and an action. Thank god you aren't in charge.

In my eyes any thought involving the sexual violation of a child is already an offence, & I would be safe in saying the majority aren't too keen on it either.

I think Dan 30 is mentally disabled. I mean he is if he is anything like his posts, but it's always possible there is some joke going on

It repugnant, but not offence. As Stein said what you're encouraging is punishment for thought crime. Its fair enough for you to feel strongly on a topic, but the basis for fundamental rights in our society is that you are not punishable for something you haven't committed.

I don't think there is any argument towards child abuse of any manner is wrong, and punishable by whatever means, but to move away from this and focus on the original point is that thought and action are not the same, for somebody to identify thoughts as wrong, unlawful or just morally wrong and make effort to correct this is a good thing and removing that persons rights to do so is draconian.

What you are implying is a dictatorship where you are explicitly stating what people are and aren't allowed to think, admittedly in this case its widely accepted that the case in question is unlawful, but that's besides the point. Maybe you are thinking of a society more like that found in communist states? I hear North Korea is nice this time of year...

Didn't Dan used to think about beating up his ex because she ditched him? Dan should be done for assault.

Asshole. Wrong & wrong.

I answered this 2 weeks ago, it wasn't my ex it was a guy, & not because she ditched me.

Calm down, everyone!

I think this preoccupation with paedophilia shows an unhealthy level of guilt on a site supposedly dedicated to picking up girls. It is true that occasionally your attention will be attracted by a girl who turns out to be too young -- with modern fashion and make-up standards it cannot be avoided -- but there is no need to go into paroxysms of self-loathing. Just make sure you don’t actually make any further approaches of a sexual nature, once you learn a girl is under-age. Again, if you are focussing on the public service aspects of your predatory behaviour, then you need not worry about going too far before you discover the truth.

Please see my instructions for how to do it right: men in public places.

Let me refer to
Exhibit A

No I'm not joking that I think people who fantasize about children are sick bastards.

No I won't agree with anyone here about showing compassion to peados who have "only had thoughts"

It's looking obvious that none of those in favour of administration of "therapy" for someone who is as MENTALLY DISABLED as a peado, have kids of their own. If you did you'd have a very different view.

If I stand alone on this one fair enough, fuck you's.

Ps. Yeah I know about the bigger picture that has been pointed out about maybe we should all go to jail because it once crossed our mind to sneak into the amusement park when we were 12, but I'm talking about peados in particular. Fuck your arguments that we're all guilty of thinking something illegal, there's no comparison.