This is the weakness of communicating by the written word on the forum like this, her comment clearly sounds one way as a third party reading it, but may mean something different to you, being imbued as you are with experiencing what has gone on before between the two of you.

If in your judgement it was “serious” then yes, reframing may be a little facetious. I still think you may be projecting that though. In any event it’s neither evasive nor weak, quite the contrary, the whole point is to be that stable centre of her life and not allow her habits to lead you, for which she will ultimately love you. David Deida is a good read on this topic, although it wouldn’t surprise me if you’ve already read him. Her question is requiring you to indulge in her insecurities, and you did infer it was a shit test rather than a genuine question yourself. If however you’re developing towards a relationship, you may want to be softer than this…but as others have said in the thread, you’ve got to keep an eye on your behaviour here.

On my general opinion of shit tests, basically per the above, but to be honest I don’t like the dynamics that the term implies. Especially if you’re moving past pickup and into dating territory, it’s healthier not to think about it. Plus it pre-supposes you have to qualify in some way, which is bollocks.

Anyway, I've got to get a wiggle on or I'll be late, hope helps though.

PS

her: "eh ?"
me: "well ... mother and daughter virgin"

this one is not really a needy trait

craving laughter is healthy and if i ever get a GF who craves to laff

i think ill be happy... on top of her bein fit like