david deangelo 77 laws

Cant go wrong with Flawless Natural, Blueprint, Foundations. Yeah Im a bit of an rsd nut :P

how so? i think ... in fact i know, there are certain ways to behave that women find attractive (as a general rule)

perhaps we have different views on what the law of attraction is

Anything to do with learning to get good/better with women can be classed as PUA material. This ranges from approaching, attraction, seduction, etc.

I think maybe we all have here, I was referring to 'the secret' and all that lot also get the impression k was, haven't checked out 77 laws yet but I'm thinking it's not what I thought you meant.

Would be interested in your views on 'the secret' K? Think last time this came up you had diffrent views..

I kinda get its a little bit for the crazies but with a pinch of salt I also regard it highly in some ways.

Db

ye the law of attraction i.e. the universe is complete crap

Okay so I'm gonna sound like a loon to some people here but I think it deserves deeper thought, yes it's cheesy and yes it stinks of self help bull shit but do hear me out and be open minded.

As reserved in judgment as I usually am, I'm still very open to 'the secret', I feel like a creationist arguing with a evolutionist but it just feels right to me.

If you want to know my logic for it then I'm a fan of David Hume and bundle theory. Add in wave collapse with conscious thought and you have a world based upon what you place conscious focus upon or choose to 'observe'. Fair enough you have to believe in free will in order to 'choose' but let's not go there just now.

Also you've got to ask the question if a completely deluded reality where you believe your perfect and a 'reality' where you are perfect are two different things? NLP teaches us 'the map is not the territory' but if the map represents our whole understanding of the world why not short circuit it? Delusional or not it's the same thing to our own consciousness, after all life may be nothing more than a dream and there is no proof otherwise.

I'm sure people have been locked in padded rooms for less but I don't think its a topic that should be so easily overlooked as mere bullshit.

Db

Then you must feel like a backwards moron who will never be taken seriously?

Yeah sure.

Anyway, By no means am i saying its 'science' but just pointing out what you can take from it from a philosophical point of view.

Looking at science from a philosophical point of view you can't prove a fucking thing anyway. See the fallacy of induction. Problem of induction - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

By no means am I saying its right. Simply pointing out there is no evidence for or against. Ie why it's like creationism vs science. Science seems to work but you still have the unmoved mover problem.

Btw I'm agnostic.

Db

dbx

You are hijacking this thread. I do not negotiate with forum terrorists! Take your radical ideas somewhere else :-P