why would someone be that sef involved that they see you have the same interests & think it a long winded ploy to bed them.. thats a woman id like to avoid.

please see previous posts.... ive fucked more women by litterally telling them its happening, than you have just had sex! so please dont pull the alpha routine on me. it wernt about sex

Knave, after your recent post "Cold Reading Pussy" I don't think you're the right person to call out creepy behaviour.

Just sayin'

Easy tiger

You mean this one.

http://www.puaforum.co.uk/seduction-...ing-pussy.html

I didn't realize how fucked up that sounds!

Oh well.

intention is a funny thing. I intend to fuck a women weather I tell her that or not has no grounds in morals. If I force her aka rape then it's wrong.

manipulative and persuasive are basically the same thing one's presented positively the other negatively. Another example would be love and obsession.

Intention to have sex with someone is fine, intention to have sex with them in a way that compromises their general expectations of the interactions the two of you have however is not.

You do not have to be Machiavellian. Deception is not part of the people's general expectations, do not abuse people's trust.

Stolen from K.

so by that count ross jeffries has higher morals than mystery cos he advocates direct openers and you never promise anything you just suggest it.

by posting clips of her favourite films isn't deception either it's merely displaying media. If you like it too then there's no problem at all.

Those parts of what Ross Jeffries suggests, yes those are more moral. You are ignoring the larger picture though. It's easy to mislead people when you only take the information that serves your argument points.

No they won't