Eckhart tolle is a cunt - Page 2 - PUA Forums - The UK's Leading Pick-up Artist Forum

Phil · 08-11-2010, 10:26 PM

actually the thread is called....

Phil · 08-11-2010, 10:43 PM

U are a collection of matter...collectively it is your body and everything inside.

your BRAIN is the main control for your body
Your mind is the collective thought patterns based on everything you have ever experienced, known etc

thats it.. no spiritualness... just evolution. Ok its nice to have a break from thought and the turmoil it may bring you... but its just biology and your bodys reaction to circumstance.

the feeling is part of you...the thought is part of you...

and so are my feelings & thoughts are also and collectively make me,

you are this collective matter. thats it... what makes us unique is our MIND

all this YOU ARE NOT YOUR MIND YOU ARE YOU, dont think about it, just know it, feel it if you cant... your doing it wrong... OR MAYBE ITS BRAINWASH CRAP.. ur all sounding EXACTLY like my weirdo Jehovah witness nan who spouted the same crap about GOD. how i shouldnt think about it or question it, i should just accept it. .. u all laff ur tits off when anyone mentions Jehovah witness... WHATS THE DIFFERENCE.

when you become present... and are doing something present like he asks... do you automatically forget everything u ever learned..?

Joe_Fresh · 08-11-2010, 11:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phil

this other view u gave on tolle is kinda the same as mine the other day, worded differently, regardless of the crap u spouted u even admited his words dont explain the concept properly, therefore HE IS CHATTIN SHIT

he took an original belief and re worded it with nlp an such like to form an ironic ego fueled campaign...

if he has one message, why does he need to do a tour, wouldnt his book be enuf
NO...obviously not SCAMMER.

and the fact that u gave a LESS SPRITRUAL view LIKE ME

means u are also chattin poo ... Mate

phil ur full of shite mate

maestro · 09-11-2010, 06:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by camarda

you are not your feelings, you are not your thoughts, and you are not your emotions. they are experienced by you. they are not what you truely are.

It's about how you choose to react to your thoughts, feeling and emotions that makes us who we are. It's what we do that defines us.

nova · 09-11-2010, 07:45 AM

I might give it a read.

Phil · 09-11-2010, 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joe_Fresh

phil ur full of shite mate

Wow u must really love eckart

Joe_Fresh · 09-11-2010, 01:22 PM

tbh phil its u i love, but ur full of shite though...

Phil · 09-11-2010, 01:48 PM

are you refering to my view on eckhart tolle...

Joe_Fresh · 09-11-2010, 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by camarda

kowalski,

you are not your feelings, you are not your thoughts, and you are not your emotions. they are experienced by you. they are not what you truely are.

thoughts are the easiest to observe, and notice. they are objects appearing across your conciousness. they disappear, they come they go. so what is behind them? who is 'this' that can see thoughts?

its not even about tolle. fuck him.

adam this doesnt stand up mate

so whats the answer then?

1) what is it that sees these thoughts/feelings/emotions?

2) is this thing part of you, if not where has it come from?

3) what is it that causes these thoughts/feelings/emotions?

the answer..

1) the mind is the thing that senses and sees these emotions

2) the mind is part of you.....how can it not be

3) in relation to this point k dogg argues that the mind causes these thoughts/feelings/emotions. in essence they do not have an independent external existence. in his view how can they. it would be absurd. your mind created the thoughts internally via chemical imbalances etc.. as such the thoughts and the thinker are actually a singularity. a thought cannot exist without a thinker. (its all connected.. our minds are part of us, they perceive and they think thoughts. at no point does our mind take on an a thought that exists independently of its own accord because such a thing does not exist)

however i think its possible to argue that thoughts do exist independently so that some thoughts are not our own and so can afflict us. my theory on this is somewhat akin to platos theory on forms. ive got to get back to work now and so will finish this soon

ps k dogg ur gay

Darood · 09-11-2010, 05:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joe_Fresh

however i think its possible to argue that thoughts do exist independently so that some thoughts are not our own and so can afflict us.

You just described a meme brother.