confused? - Page 2 - PUA Forums - The UK's Leading Pick-up Artist Forum

B rad · 23-10-2010, 10:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kowalski

Respect.

Do you know why you don't want a monogamous relationship right now?

Yeah cause I haven't met someone who excites me enough to want to spend time exclusively with them. I've been reading about getting girls to qualify themselves to me and am going to start using this right from the beginning so that if they aren't interesting I'll be able to leave it at that, instead of ploughing through to get a number when I wouldn't really want their number anyway.

I've stumbled across a few of my notes from an Anthony Robbins seminar I went to and the words "KNOW YOUR OUTCOME" sprung out to me. If I now know what type of a girl I am looking for then it makes it easier for me to find them.

And thanks Zed

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zed

Don't. Its a non-issue that you're seeing other girls, unless they actually get stuck on that point and make it one.
When you start telling them about your lifestyle, that you're social, that you meet a lot of women, they should be able to figure it out.
For this second part, take some advice off other people as well!

This makes loads of sense. I'm getting it that I don't have to qualify what I do to anyone but myself.

trickster · 11:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kowalski

I'm not aware of pretty strong evidence about the breeding habits of our distant ancestors. I know of only a couple of shed's worth of bones of most of our history. This kind of theory resembles one of Rudyard Kipling's trully genius Just So Stories. It is far from science and infinitely further still from fact.

I won't discuss the anthropological stuff because the behaviours found in individualised groups cannot be generalised to cover all human pre-history.

However, as you already agreed monogamy is a type of contract and contracts assume honesty etc. etc., you logically also accept that monogamy is not an artificial etc. etc. all of that is academic.

Peace,

kowalski

Seek and ye shall find, being unaware of something, does not mean it doesn't exist. Only that there is something that you are unaware of.

archaeology anthropology ancient civilizations

I have never agreed that monogamy is a type of contract, I merely refer to your use of this bizarrely random axiom. I suppose the irony slipped past your otherwise vigilant conciousness?

peace and love and let's be buddies =)

As you say, be authentic

Zed · 25-10-2010, 10:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kowalski

I challenged your view of monogamy because it is one of many theories that PUAs blindly submit to. They're like the male equivalent of all the nonsense feminists spout. I'm not interested in convincing you trickster, just popping the truth out there I can't control what happens next.

Damn straight! Isn't it part of the indoctrination process to blindly follow before going "oh shit, I've just been brainwashed. Not by the media, but by all these pickup books"

Quote:

Originally Posted by kowalski

Why would we not be cool? This discussion is merely academic for me. Forum members often mistake intellectual discussion for personal attack, as you did (hence the digs you gave me). Learning to tell the difference saves a lot of unnecessary negativity.

Might be worth remembering this, unless you enjoy the conflicts it causes?