does anyone know anything about this? seems really interesting

Hmmmm, no you havn't, cause if you did then you'd know it wasn't about seduction.

So there you were, at the end of a sarge, purposefully crafting your evening by saturating your senses with the many different exquisite flavours of woman available until finally you come upon one who has the sexual energetic consistency of treacle. You establish your value, laugh with her, create an atmosphere of safety and honour her with the gift of your presence by seeing her for who she really is. Now, as is law, nature must reward you for your efforts. You have been deemed worthy of the trust for her to open herself to you. Now she wants to fuck.

At this point you may want to ask yourself, "How can I give this pussy cat a sexual experience that she will cherish for the rest of her life," and as you stare in to the depthless innocence behind her eyes you see the empty canvass that will bare your command....

...because you've actually read Hyper Emperia! A grimoire concerning the application of neuro linguistic technique to the sexual act. Time distortion, amping her senses, matching sensations, expanding her neurology, stacking orgasms and guiding her experience in general.

Business as usual for some

You don't add anything to your sexual performance or how long you fuck for because you don't do anything physically different. You simply augment her perception of what you do already...

Well, that's what the spiel implies at least. Personally, I do plenty different but that comes with experience

lol - "it's for losers" Yeah, after I gave a girl her first stacked orgasm that's exactly what she said...

To be authentic, your ability to personalise and value judge the simple question that started this thread smacks of insecurity.

I thought my multisensular description in the above explained how it’s actually about value, security and trust (with a good dollop of funny thrown in for lube). The language simply facilitates an elegant delivery for your intentions, which is what really counts. As previously elucidated in my article, what really matters are your intentions for the other person and who you are, not a string of words.

“Instead of tricking girls into thinking you're charismatic, funny, a great lover etc., you could actually become those things.” Exactly, there is no trick; you have to BE the emotional content of your language otherwise you’re incongruent, the unconscious knows it and you’re just spouting depthless sentences impotently.

Also, if her impression is one of funny/charisma or whatever then who are you to tell her that her definitions are wrong. Authentically, I think this highlights the narcissistic assumption in your opinion that, consciously or unconsciously, you define what is funny or charismatic (otherwise it must be a trick...) when of course all these things are in the eye of the beholder.

This should be the bread and butter of a Philosopher King…

Vive la Différence! \o/

Hi,
I'm new here.
Were can i find this Hyper Empiria? I'm curious about it