If we were to sit the rapist down, drug him with Sodium Pentathol for some straight answers, a line of questioning on intent may look something like this.

What do you intend for that woman?

To fuck her (method would be “fucking”)

How do you intend to do this?

With force (method would be “forcing”)

Notice that the intent can be translated linguistically in to method simply by turning it in to a process by adding “ing” on to the disguised verb. This is the magical act of the method being an externalised manifestation of an internal intent. High five for Mr.Crowley :]

Therefore, the Meta Intent that we all share is to fuck. However, our intentions of how to actualise this will vary depending on the rules around our current values. This can be seen at work in the legal system when differentiating between things like premeditated murder and manslaughter, by chunking up from a persons methods to define their intent.

Personally, I totally believe that the human being operating from a frame of abundance doesn’t have to worry about any of this as his nature will guide him naturally to express consideration for the other person.

Human being work perfectly when allowed to reach equilibrium with their needs, no rule book required