haha i like that one can u post tehm all please mate??

Slow response, been busy.

I like to speak in facts rather than observations. I've been doing this for a long time now and I'm a literature nut, I have an extremely large library of reading and if I'm able to I'll always point to the facts that back up anything I say. Why? Because fact is better than experience, see: confirmation bias.

Now that I'm home, the term is misattribution of arousal, the most recent study on it is actually in a text book I have to hand - Baumeister and Bushman. Social Psychology & Human Nature.

I can't find an online copy of that one I'm afraid, there's plenty that explains the principle online though.

This lecture at Yale discusses it:

Transcript 9 - Evolution, Emotion, and Reason: Love (Guest Lecture by Professor Peter Salovey) — Open Yale Courses

Psychwiki has a good explanation of it:

Misattribution of Arousal Paradigm - PsychWiki - A Collaborative Psychology Wiki

And this is the most cited study on the topic (96):

http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/psp/41/1/56/

For the simple concepts I'd recommend just reading the wiki, psycholoy lectures are long and without understanding surrounding concepts they can be difficult to keep up with, even at the foundation level this applies to. Studies tend to use language that's very specific and difficult to grasp unless you're used to it.

Basically it gives scientific backing and fact to the concept of just making people emotional, even if it's not the good kind.

That's okay no need to apologise, you shouldn't go through life apologising, the first link is psychobabble and not very good babble but hey that’s the americans for you, the second is indeed concise if not a bit dated there is far more recent studies done and the answer is no (I can’t be arsed).

Incidentally, is now a good time to tell you what I got my degree in?

The third link seems unavailable unless I pay for it or download from a torrent site.

Basically, you're links support the theory that scaring her half to death is a way to loosen her thighs and there is no so such thing as bad emotional effect, unless you were conducting tests when 'wham' were still in the charts.

Assuming you want to fuck her on the first date, the sort and sweet answer to an exciting date is stop thinking romantic walks in the park and start thinking robbing an 'offy' or jacking a car.

Can't find the page I'm afraid Phil. I can remember a couple though:

1. Dress up - you as Pacman, her as a ghost and chase each other through the town shouting "wacca wacca wacca!"

2. Go to the beach early in the morning and watch the sun come up together. Take a picnic.

3. Go around the town with some chalk and write equations in hearts on random objects.

what the fuck happened to gettin her drunk??

That's what AFC's do when they run out questions like 'where you from', 'what do you do'

i know people u would class as AFC (or just someone who hasnt read the game)

who have banged more birds than u ever will....

just coz pullin girls without method, the way its been done for years isnt in a book u can buy, dont mean it dusnt work....

infact, there are girls who GAMING doesnt work on coz they r too thik to get anythin... they just fuck lads who ask

where u from
what do u do

and these are FIT but THICK model types... so ask urself, do u care how u do it if ur just lookin to hang out of a fitty???

its good to know the stuff, but not feel like u have to coz it is written.

there is no right or wrong way of doin anything as long as it works for u

Absolutely if it works for you then why change it.

If going up to a girl and saying you're hung like a sperm whale gets results then cool.

I use the 'AFC' phrase a lot and its about the only thing I remember from the 'game', what I do remember is watching hordes of guys in nightclubs getting blown out after about 3 minutes because mainly they've bored her to death with the same old bollocks she gets time and time again, then I'd wander up and assume something about her and instantly shes intriqued.

I didn't apologise.

This sounds like fun, what's your degree in Knave?

Outside of France, Stanford and Yale are recognised as having the best psychology departments, you didn't actually read or listen to the transcript at all either did you? It's far from psychobabble.

That source is perfectly up to the globally accepted APA standards. If you're about to tell me that you studied psychology then you ought to already know that you don't get study access online without paying for them or reading the relevant journals.

Phil. I've never met a thick model, I'm pretty sure that stereotype doesn't exist. I've met plenty of thick wannabe models though that think having a few model type photos done makes them a model.

Really tho???? are you defo sticking with this statement?