NLP Routine
I'm pretty new at this, so this may already have been invented a billion years ago for all I know but it's worked well for me so I thought I'd share in case it was new or unknown to the forum.
This is based around the NLP concept that eye movements betray the representational system at use (Simply put, if a person recalls an image, his/her eyes go up; sound-sideways, feeling-downwards). It's best to be sitting down close and opposite to the target (such as at a bar table). Tell the target that you can read minds. You ask the target to think (in turn) of the most beautiful painting/view she can remember, her favourite song and the feeling of being on the beach/dancing/whatever she likes to do (get this info beforehand). Make her really 'get into' these memories-picture all the details of the image, hear the song in her head, remember the sensations of her favourite experience. Check her eye movements as you tell her to do all this, to see if she is part of the 99% (made-up statistic, but it's a high number anyway) for whom memories are represented in this way. Then, ask her to bring up one of those memories again, without saying which (again, tell her to really 'get into' the memory). You then tell her, triumphantly, which one it was. If you get it wrong, act shocked and go 'Wow, you're one of the 3.4 percent of people (or whichever statistic you find realistic) whose mind can't be read. That means you must be really confident to be able to keep me out...' Advantages: -DHV/chick crack -Anchoring (she relives postive emotions and now may associate them with you) -You can teach her the trick later on for another routine Based on my opening statement, you are either welcome or I apologise for wasting your time. |
Haha not saying that I take NLP as gospel (or that Bandler isn't a bit of a looney), but the eye movement system appears to be genuine from my own experience.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Well, the way I understand it, value is not something you 'give' but something you must have or be perceived to have in order to attract, according to Mystery's 'evolutionary switches' theory. Maybe I just didn't completely understand the way you were expressing the term.
|
Jeez, sorry for being thorough. And not to be pedantic (well, a little) but the first article gives no evidence of the eye thing being disproven besides saying that one 'David Platt' (didn't he used to play for England?), 'drawing from' a German NLP website (?) 'found that the science found' that it doesn't work, making no reference to Mr. Platt in his bibliography. I'm also rather put off by the author's comparison of this basically innocent set of tricks for communication with dangerous, immersive cults such as Scientology.
All I know is many MPUA's (Gambler, Style, Mystery, Ross Jeffries) use or claim to use (parts of) NLP, including the eye accessing clues. Even Derren Brown, Britain's most famous skeptic of new age and misleading pseudo-science, doesn't condemn NLP. In his view (which I share), it is based on some valid ideas but currently taught by smug 'gurus' who prey on the weak and make exaggerated claims about it. Anyway, we're going way off topic here. If you don't buy into NLP, don't use the routine (and once again, it worked a treat for me with a redhead 9 the other week). For the rest of you, try it out and tell me your experience. |
Quote:
Instead consider the concept of giving the girl value, not in order to gain a response, but because you want to do it and don’t care what anyone thinks. This is more about being sexually unashamed. This is attractive. |
I
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:36 PM. |
Pick-Up Artist Forum UK
Copyright © 2024