Strawberry Fields

The purpose of this game is to gain insight into how your target approaches sex and sexuality. It can be used to elicit information for your own use/screening or to steer the conversation to racier places.

The height of the boundary relates to the target's willingness to participate in sexual activity. e.g.

1) Large, electrified metal, spiky fence with padlocked gate and CCTV = less willing
2) Small wire fence with open gate = more willing

Represents how many sexual partners the target has had or wants in the future.

Represents how you feel about your sexual partners after receiving sexual gratification.

Once you have the answers, it's not essential to reveal the true intent to your target. It's easy to get away with using "attitude to new things" in place of "attitude to sex".

It's also possible to use it to arouse curiosity and in order to get your target's phone number.

Then wait 25...



-

Interestin shit man. Personally, Id leave it till comfort.

Man your display picture has got to bite.
My god.
-Fuck off

Jaz changed my avatar for gay porn the cunt.
All betta now...

I thought we agreed not to talk about this in public darling

I've used it in set before and didnt really know where to go when I found out she was after all the strawberrys... >.>

This is one of the first routines i ever learnt and it's a really good gambit . Women love to be analysed and asked questions .

Here's alittle tip , after one or two of her answers , act alittle surprised and hesitant . It's a small disqualification and drives em wild .

Swype

I much prefer the Cube to be honest as it gives you more options, then if that goes well I'll follow it up with strawberry fields.

One thing I might try is once I've described what it is then offering to do it on them for free. I reckon it will give it a little extra value.

I can see where your coming from,

I use it as a value building routine, then after thats done before I go any further its upto her to prove whether or not she gets anymore time with me.

Last Friday I did the cube on a girl in front of two of her friends, they all thought it was amazing and wanted more. But when they asked me to show them something else I just said "Hey I'm not here to entertain you ya know. Why dont you teach me something cool" then I was off into A3..

Interesting stuff, although I don’t think classical routines and personal passions need to be mutually exclusive.

“You should only learn things that you think are impressive or that you love, then talk about them with passion.”

I disagree, this demonstrates behavioural inflexibility and ignores the inherent importance of certain knowledge. Of course it’s central to have integrity about topics that are of genuine personal importance as this makes the passion communicated authentic, effortless and displays higher value. Also, you’re fucked when you run out of material and aren’t much more than a dancing pattern monkey. However, certain topics are just more inherently suitable depending on gender. For example, if I talk to a girl about how to sink a rear naked choke on the knife edge of her radius, it is entertaining when well presented, but it’s naturally geared towards guys. A woman’s emotional circuitry is geared towards routines like Cube etc because they appeal to her intuition and her ability to gauge relationships, as the number of psychic ads at the back of any chics magazines will testify. As funny and as personally appealing as an “Escape the headlock” routine might be, it’d unsuitable and inflexible. Material that inherently appeals to her nature as a woman gives the PUA a platform to demonstrate the real value of his personality, which should be based on genuine passion if he’s to last longer than his material.

"If you are giving away things that have value for free, this is essentially a form of payment."

I don’t think free exists, there’s just the towards pleasure and away from pain principle and the endlessly subjective nature of the word “value”. I think what it really comes down to is how conscious are you of this ceaseless exchange of perceived value, how much of a good deal are you actually getting and how is this affecting everyone else.

I do, however, recognise the integrity demonstrated in your post Kowalski and I think that this quality makes a clunky win/lose transaction become a much more elegant win/win exchange with more jiggery pokery all round.