Yo people!

Just been reading another thread that made me think about starting this one.

So whats some of the more kinky/daring/stupid shit u guys have done with/to girls/girlfriends.

One eyed angry pirate
Arabian goggles
Costumes..
Etc..


Ive realised alot of girls love getting properly dominated but tend to require some form of 'plausible deniability' first.

All girls like being dominated in some way. It's instinct.

What the hell does 'plausible deniability' mean? Are you actually over-thinking the most natural thing we as humans, do?

1. Make her cum really hard.
2. Establish boundaries by testing the water...
3. Do what the fuck you like. Like, seriously anything...

In fact No.2 can often be ignored.

..look it up..?

no

like, seriously no

So you use words you don't understand, in the wrong context about topics you clearly have little experience in...

How's that working out for you?

ye plausible deniability doesnt really fit here. its to do with ranking. and withholding info from front men who are put under question. i.e. president being kept in the dark so he can truthfully deny a lie.

anyway that aside. women dont need anythin other than to be attracted to the dominator.

Sounds like ur upset HammerTime. I refer you to your initial question;

is it not you who doesn't understand the term..? dont worry mate your forum cred is still in one piece.


ahh wikipedia, well done phil

Plausible deniability is an concept that can be used in a vast array of contexts, not just the political/legal.

In a sexual context, a guy may know that a girl likes rough sex but when the time comes for sex he finds that she doesnt request/initiate/hint at such rough sex (all things being normal). In this situation a guy (who may not be that keen on rough sex) will provide the girl with plausible deniability for such sex (which she actually craves) by starting the process of initiating rough sex under the guise that thats what he needs to do to get his kicks. As such he gives her exactly what she wants/needs without her accepting initial responsibility for the act. ie she gets what she wants whilst plausibly denying responsibility for initiating it. On the face of it she is able to retain a veil of "innocence".

A crude example but should suffice.

so you dont know what ur talking about, so when your corrected it must be via a wiki search. Fuck off u lemon.

Why the rant?

p.s. thats ur take on it, its not the absolute truth. if ur good enuf with women, they will show u their true colours anyway, there is only a veil if you haven't done you job.

im goin asleep now, so the following post ur gonna do, saying the same shit in 8 diff ways as if thats gonna change my mind. You can Keep it

hit a nerve?

your far too clever for me phil

I'm cleverer than all of you...

We get side tracked because some nonce always starts talking shit.

I don't care about plausible deniability because I'm not in the fucking CIA. I do not waste my time learning irrelevant bollocks, and I'm not going to pretend to know something. This is the internet, anyone can pretend to be anything if they do enough research.

You say that she won't comfortably initiate dominating sex (all things being normal). Of course she won't, because you're supposed to be dominating her...?

The girl rarely initiates anything unless she's mega horny. All other times, it's the man's job.

Next time, when you would normally ask her if she'd like some plausible deniability with her orgasm, just slam her head into the bed, smack her arse and pull her hair.