The JACKAL's take on RSD, Direct, and Indirect Game -
29-12-2011, 05:22 PM
This RSD stuff is good for inner game is good, but it is over-rated. It will give some guys an excuse to be lazy and sit down like some hippies smoking a joint.
I feel it’s about balance. We are all looking for validation, in one way or another. It is wrong to say otherwise. We are not living like hermits. We are motivated by the desire of gain and the fear of loss. We are animals first and foremost let’s not forget that.
This inner game thing has the potential of being seen as another magic pill. From my experience only by doing solo and wing sarging do u learn. I treat this like a sport like bodybuilding if u stop working out u will lose ur skill, there is no short cut. The only ones who can actually 'be' are professional PUAs who have to 'be' as it relates to their job 24/7.
My experience and from guys I know who fall into relationship game who stop sarging, AFC reversal will get u. Those that are scared never stop sarging.
I am not speaking of born naturals. I am speaking as a Darwinian I believe in NATURAL SELECTION. Professionals will never tell that not all of us were designed to be alpha males. This should not stop us from learning though. The brain will always resist the urge to be alpha if that is not its default position.
Most people are just too boring that is why they need to learn stuff. That’s not a put down that’s honesty. It takes confidence to admit ones flaws. I’m sure Shakespeare's work was more impressive in print then it was him talking about the weather.
PAVLOV is all u need. Even this is not new. The carrot and the stick has been around for 1000 years.
I have not met anyone other than a instructor whom had the patience to actually learn a full routine, most would struggle just doing an opinion opener and then introducing themselves. So I am suspicious of those doing natural who say they did learnt stuff before. My guess is they gave up before even trying it properly.
Those that think words don’t matter try saying that to William Shakespeare or Charles Dickens. The other assumption is that those doing lines are robots, which is wrong. Think top actors delivering an awesome line with great acting.
Only extreme human beings believe in themselves without the need for evidence. I will strongly doubt if this is at all possible. Great sporting athletes have that mindset instilled from outside by their parents.
The only guys I have come across who had absolute confidence were friends who were high on drugs. One thought he was god and other thought he was a savior of some sort, and yes they were congruent. So they had to be locked up for a while.
RSD is saying we can think confidence. It’s not wrong, just unrealistic. We are emotional machines.
The direct stuff is best for innergame but u a need charisma to carry ½ hour to 2 hour conversation. Otherwise direct game will last 2 seconds.
Indirect is best or Outer Game
Thank u.
|