What are yours?

I'm on the lines of: no smokers, drug users, work colleagues, house mates.

This girl from work who is a smoker gave me her number via fb, and she' a cutie, but the fact that we work together and she smokes puts her out of the picture; even though im not getting any and sex no strings is always nice.

Thoughts?

I'm with the first two points. I would literally end a conversation and walk away no matter what if she was a smoke or drug user. Disgusting smell of smoke on her later really gets to me. My first girl friend was a smoker but she did quit and I would never go back to that again.

Work Colleagues are fine as long as its descrete or doesn't involve direct management chains etc. If they're someone completely different department its fine.

House mates, again depends wouldn't have a rule against it.

I dont have standards - when it comes to somone that isnt going to be my wife
If i see somthing in somone that gives me the horn then i`ll have them

When it comes to relationship material, they cant have kids, they cant smoke etc etc

Yeah already having kids is a no for me too, obviously once you get a bit older it becomes more normal if you're single at 40-50 but as long as I'm in 20's 30's it will the aim to start my own family unit with no baggage.

lol @ 'no uglies'

I'm going with jaz and reflex, the girl originally in question is getting boned. That's where it'll end.

I think i need to stick to my standards a lot more,i am very prone to letting them slip rather easily when a lay is on the cards and then feel bad about it the next day.
Like most just for a lay im no so fussy,hotter the better.
Id say in view of a relationship tho must be fit,alternative (prefer goth),really short/petite,no kids,no hard drugs,no smoking,not a heavy drinker and must have their own purpose/things going on in life.

I wish that I could figure out clear standards, but I cant. Its a combination of:

- looks (according to most guys' 10 scale they'd have to be 8+, but I really dont subscribe to that model... and cute don't cut it either)
- personality (I hate shy girls. passive is ok, but not shy. And no whiny bitches either)
- height (this is important to me, as I'm 6'5", so I dont waste time with short girls anymore)

after that, I'm not sure. But I can say that most slip through the cracks of not being worthy to be in my bed

Forget about all this bullshit...You are just limiting the potentially great people you could meet in your lives with a set random 'rules' and 'standards', be open and let people surprise you.

Failing that, check out her ipod/CD collection as soon as you can...if it's nothing by X Factor promoted bullshit, Take That, Robbie Williams, Micheal Bubblei etc then JUST RUN! Stuff like Beyonce's 'all the single girls' and 'don't ya wish your girlfriend was hot like me' etc are also major red flags in my book.

If all or most of her music collection is music no straight man in his right mind could stand then there's a 99% chance she's a twat...


No wait hear me out...

It's just a theory but when a women has been in one or more proper balanced relationships in her life time there's always evidence of it on her Ipod. If you find stuff like the Stones, Dylan, Tupac, Dre etc then she's probably been sane and level headed enough to have dated a decent bloke or two long enough for him to have introduced her to some REAL music...If the only music on there is boybands and 'girl power' bullshit that no straight man in his right mind could stand, then she's in all probability an emotionally immature pain in the ass. Seriously, I've tested this theory...you can set your watch to it honest!

If it's all Cheryl Cole's solo stuff then she's either never dated a bloke for more than 2 weeks or only dates blokes she can walk all over...either way 'walk on by'...

Joker u contradicted urself.

In ur first paragraph u talk about having standards, then u rant on about not having standards.