I don't think you understand what negging is, although thats probably a good thing.

haha your answer will back up my claim. That's why you won't. :)

Negging is playfully putting a girl down, taking the piss out of her, playful banter, just like how many people talk to each other every single fucking day.

But just because it has been given a name (Negging) it's evil and manipulative.

Errrm... Nope. You always do this. You're actually retarded at argument.

You made a claim about this book the game. Now you have been challenged to back that claim and instead you are asking questions of the other. That's a fallacious move. Even the dumbest of the dumb know this.

The onus of proof is on you.

Whether you understand this or agree with it or whatever is irrelevant. It's simply how argument works.


Peace,

kowalski

Haha arrogant dicks always confuse their thinking, their ideas with facts or reality.

Now you are on the defensive, name calling. I might be offended if those insults came from somebody with the ability to think properly without personal biases or ego.

I will answer the questions for you. Yes to both.

So you have done 2 things that the old school PUAs guys would teach, and was also in the book "The Game." But according to Dan and probably yourself everything in that book was nonsense. How does that work?

That doesn't back your claim.


Peace,

kowalski

In so much denial Kowalski! you know that's a defensive mechanism.

Not that everything in the book was nonsense. Just that most of it was seedy, sleazy shit. The PUA acronyms. The in-field signals. The manipulative techniques applied. The weird routines (that stemmed from mystery's magician background). Oh and now I mention it, the bizzare alter-egos that they named themselves, like fucking mystery.

There's some genuine psychology stuff that's sound, perhaps like rocking on the back foot and whatever. But if you're consciously thinking about doing that kind of thing "in set", you've already lost. Because your mind is elsewhere, ticking off the next box, rather than being authentic.

If you don't already have the skills you have to work on things consciously for them to become unconscious, automatic or authentic.

That's how you develop skills.

unconscious incompetence - don't know you're shit at something.
conscious incompetence - Now you know you're shit.
conscious competence - Got skills but you still have to think about it.
unconscious competence - Becomes natural, authentic, automated.

This also applies to basic applied psychology techniques for being a good conversationalist.

You manipulate people whenever you talk to them, when you smile at someone, it's a complete misconception that manipulation is a bad word. Hypnosis is demonised as well by those who believe what they see on TV.

Here's my denial, lol. I deny that you have backed your claim because without at least some quotes from the text you've proved nothing about the content of the book. I deny it because to deny it is to speak the truth about it.

I actually have to explain this to you. Do you understand what means?

It means that you have no clue how argument works. Therefore, as I've proved every time you pop up chatting shit, you are wrong about nearly everything in life.

Sucks to be you.


Peace,

kowalski