Quote:
Originally Posted by Temperance
I take it nobody has laid a lesbian or are not willing to share their knowledge in this then?
Hopefully I'll find my info elsewhere, cheers.
|
Depends exactly what you mean. I used to have a flatmate who identified as lesbian at the time, and certainly seemed to prefer girls to men, but would turn into a horny raging maniac when she got drunk. As I was a also a horny raging maniac at that point in time, the inevitable happened. That wasn't great on either side tbh.
Aside from that there have been a few girls who've been into both guys and guys, one who identified as pansexual, which either meant she was into everything or liked to fuck kitchenware.
These kind of things are all exceptions to the rule though.
I'll admit Topaz's reaction to your question was a bit over the top, especially considering that after being criticised when he first showed up here he spent several months doing contributing nothing but salty passive aggression. But, maybe it's not everyone else who is being unreasonable. Maybe you're the one who's being ridiculous.
You do realise that you're acting exclusively interested in the one group who, by definition, are not sexually attracted to men? To clarify, that means nope. Not fucking interested. Like if a gay dude used some slick
PUA technique on you are you going to fuck him? If he could trick you into it would it be right for him to do that? Or would he just be acting like an unreasonable asshole?
There are tons, fucking tons, of women out there who love having sex with guys. The fuck's wrong with that? Why lesbians? Are you that jaded that you can only get a thrill by persuading someone who isn't actually attracted to you to fuck you? How often are you actually getting laid?
Really what this almost certainly is is that you're fettishizing lesbians as a byproduct of your own scarcity. If you were getting laid enough this kind of thing wouldn't even occur to you, let alone bother you.
But yeah, clearly we're the ones being unreasonable.