Realise that everything that has happened (the exposed scam video, Andy shaming Tom, the email exchanges between Tom and Andy, Tom claiming it was an isolated incident) is entirely congruent with daygame.com being a scam company.
Of course, Andy would come out and scapegoat Tom Torero, and of course Tom Torero would go along with it.
Scapegoating Tom minimises the financial losses of the company. Simple as that.
In fact, Andy seemed a little
too eager to come out and publish all the (prefabricated?) email exchanges and text messages etc etc.
Watch the hands not the mouth.
Use this case to your advantage. Consider what makes you think Krauser, for example, 'routinely bangs girls half his age' or his statistics are as he claims...
1) you see him talk to girls on camera... and 2) uh, he just says he does.
It's not a question of whether gaming in general works. It's a question of the perceived value of the products that these companies sell.
If I was a salesman and I wrote a book or made a website about how to sell, I could tell the truth about how much I sell... or I could exaggerate a bit... or quite a lot... Would I really tell people if my selling average actually went
down from last year? Would Krauser or any other
pua?
Maintaining money flow, power and popularity is often a higher priority than telling the truth to a bunch of strangers whom one has no emotional ties to.
Just sayin.