Happy 2010 guys!
This post is probably my most polemic and is in no way intended to be offensive but instead seen as an expression of my aquired moral values.
Background
I recently became a member of the facebook group '
PUA aristocracy'. Among other prominent members the group includes 'guru' Ross Jeffries. I quickly became involved in the prominant discussion at the time which was a thread entitled "Older men younger girl".
Poster: "I'm 63, been told I don't look it, certaily don't feel it. I am divorecd with grown up kids. Kinda gave up, short of time and money but an extremely diastorous attempt to date a girl of 26..."
Ross Jeffries: "I'm 51. My last GF was 20 when we broke up. I met her when I was 48 and she was 18....These girls are still developing a good work ethic, a strategy to stay organized. They are overstimulated and over-stressed and WILL occasionally flake. They often have attention spans of about 72 hours. IF YOU DO NOT FUCK THEM THE FIRST TIME YOU HAVE THEM ALONE AND ARE PHYSICAL WITH THEM, YOU LIKELY WILL NOT FUCK THEM... Learn to touch them. Boys their age will pound them but can't touch them erotically to save their lives."
'Older men younger girl'
Suprisingly I was the only person to argue against the viewpoint shown by Mr. Jeffries in this debate and needless to say I became sickened by what many were suggesting. I presented this argument:
Flake: "I am fully aware that he does not want to target a more appropriate age group but that in itself is inherently strange. People generally are attracted to people they can empathise with and three generations apart is way too far for much common ground. Biologically its not meant to happen - people are initially attracted to qualities of youth or that represent youth and fertility yet as we age people should look for commitment on less superficial grounds as corrosponds with the individuals loss of fertility.
I can't change the guys mind but the situation is definately abnormal and I will not advocate using psychological manipulation to attract women when it is not at all in their interest."
The Ethics of Attraction
After reading The Game I very quickly became aware of the moral questions that arose from 'seduction'. On one hand it empowers 'nice' men to attract women who would otherwise overlook them yet on the other many schools teach methods that are undeniably manipulative. I feel that many of us on this forum are very enlightened and have respect for other people yet outside this forum there is this sinister side that goes beyond wanting to have fun and live a happier, more sucessful life. The mantra of pickup, 'any man can attract any woman', seems to have lead many men to the belief that it is right to attract any woman.
There are many situations where it is NOT AT ALL RIGHT to seduce a woman. My belief is that seduction is ok when it is in both parties interest and not achieved by manipulation(this includes psychological manipulation in the same way it includes bribary and blackmail). This isn't to say openers and use of body language is evil but when it transcends the point of just wanting to have fun and be a more awesome person it becomes wrong.
This obviously isn't a black and white matter; no one can say what is definately right and wrong. I do think though that it is clear people should be genuine and honest. Pickup should be about the aquisition of confidence and the development of social skills. It should be about changing yourself, not the women you meet. I do not agree with guys hitting on taken women or hitting on women of a vastly different age(more specifically younger women) when the guy uses anything more than his genuine self to attract them. The women needs to make an uninfluenced decision and in many cases women will not follow thier gut feeling if there are big negative consequences. If a woman, unmanipulated, makes the decision to forsake their partner or whatever to be with someone else then this when its ok.
Now I'm not trying to imply women are weak or can be easily persuaded to do things against their will but there are techniques that can be used to manipulate almost any person into doing things of no benefit to themselves and the people who are most vulnerable to this are the least confident and least socially adept people - the most innocent people. I've introduced a massive topic here and my opinions are by no means authoritive or conclusive but they are from a humanist and considerate perspective. I'd like to know what you guys have to add.