All I did was say that women will convey conflicting views on what they think they want and what they want (in fact I just tried to clarify what K was saying) and I had a go at christianity.

I'm not sure why you're having a dig at RSD in this thread seems a bit odd. Are you saying that all we do is spout RSD and have no personnel opinions for ourselves?
Surely RSD actually teaches you to think for yourself and be natural so criticising a method which tells you to develop your own views and move away from routines is strange to me.

It's also strange how you used fun and sexual which is one of the main teachings to describe another way which I presume (but I could be wrong) is the more scientific, colder routine based stuff.