Quote:
Originally Posted by HammerTime
I asked you a question, and that was your answer? If you cannot explain something simply, then you do not understand it.
|
Rhetorical question posed not for answering but to discredit and merely introduce your own forthright take on a side matter I only briefly mentioned in my OP. As if you just couldn’t resist the opportunity to tell all your “truth” about domination and girls.
Quote:
Originally Posted by HammerTime
Here is the answer you should have given: "I find girls sometimes like to pretend they don't like to be dominated, so you don't think they're a whore. But really, I know they like to be dominated."
There, simple.
Although simple, it is wrong. Because (as my original comment pointed out) this just doesn't happen. It's a load of shit.
|
Well thank you for telling me the answer I should have given. Unfortunately HammerTime its wrong. Please see the example written previously. It is quite clear you still fail to understand.
Quote:
Originally Posted by HammerTime
The fact you started this thread shows you'd probably have trouble dominating a marshmallow. Yet, you feel you have adequate experience to correct me on a topic I would actually pick as my speciality subject on Mastermind?
|
Mastermind? Sure mate. Congrads!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil
the issue is when people try to use PUA lingo on this forum, and theory. then proclaim it as fact. |
Did you not identify the term as being a political/legal one? Which is it?
Is it not more appropriate to say
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil
the issue is when ""people"" Phil tr""y""ies to tell people what is acceptable ""use PUA lingo" on this forum"", and theory"". then proclaims it as fact.
|