My responce to god being scientifically impossible debate.
For religion to be correct it would mean our understanding of even the most basic science is incorrect and to be fair, I don't see god building computers whereas science and, it must be said, incresing atheism has lead to more technological progress in 100 years than there's been in 10,000.
Lets take heaven for example. In order to go to heaven or for their to be any form of an afterlife you would need a 'soul' yeah? or at least something that makes you conscious. I propose now the question; what is this soul composed of? It would have to be made of something, that is to say have mass and so this mass would literally have to physically move to heaven, which also must have mass. Also I question the extent to which people are in control of themselves; a person who is an alcoholic would think differently, have a different personality, if they were sober because of the different levels of hormones and the difference in neuro-chemical reactions - where's their soul?