The lay guide - dreadful
 

I have just read the Layguide online here: How to Lay Girls Guide and its quite dreadful. For example its street approach technique is to walk towards a woman you see in the distance and block her path and hopefully she will say; "Excuse me", you are then supposed to say; "Its no problem you would have stopped me in my tracks even if you weren't blocking my way". I can't believe how bad the advice in this book is. It makes Richard La Ruina's "The Natural" look like a masterpiece. I only looked up this book because one of the best pick up artists Nick Krauser mentioned it in one of his videos and I was quite impressed with his infield videos. But to show just how bad it is it even advises asking a woman for sex after she tells you her name and then claims this has a one in twenty five success rate. Even I could have written a far better book than this. Whoever wrote this book is an idiot. There is nothing on body language, how to use your voice at the correct volume, the right amount of distance to have when opening etc and no illustrations. I have seen it reviewed on Amazon and most of the reviews must be fake because no one could rate this book highly.

This is a pulled together guide made up of random material snippets that were around from the 90's/early 2000.

Glanced over 3 articles and as you can imagine, it's shit, outdated, the guy had a weird love of ':)' emotions and full of Mystery.

Another crap piece of advice is to never argue with the woman you are trying to get off with. Even the Mystery Method suggests that you should not agree with everything a woman says and minor disagreements over some points help to build attraction because otherwise you come across as fake.

It does when done on minor points as it shows that you are independent minded and also that you are not bending over backwards to try to get her. Inother words is signifies none neediness. You obviously don't want to start an argument though, but minor disagreements do help to build attraction as you will come across as more genuine and appear none outcome dependent.

And how exactly are you independently minded when all of your 'facts' and based from stuff you read on the internet?

Every quote, link and echo'ed words of a PUA are all intended as sales pitches towards the topic he's talking about.

Completely biased and designed to capture the narrow minded, like Stonecastle. Even now, he will now pick out a certain sentence in my post/s and then write his own reply trying so hard to criticize my post to enforce that self denial.

I'll just wait for the notification email Stonecastle. Take your time....

I can't quite decide if its narrow mindedness, or simple absent mindedness...
Though I confess to looking forward to that notification email too!

We know about reality, don't mess with the fantasy.

8db
3foot
Head tilted slightly to the left
8 arm touches
3 shoulder touches
A palm reading
1 face touch
4 negs
2 pushes
3 pulls
A boyfriend destroyer (if needed)
3 time constraints
Zero openers... They are just stupid

Nothing at all?