Women's sexual past
 

Who are we to judge?!

I wonder what you think - to me, I'm less attracted (and perhaps slightly frustrated) by girls with a large sexual past.

This is hypocritical mind ;) - and I in some ways I don't think it's fair or logical.

I could lie to them, and to myself, to give my frame more sexual openness, but I want to keep lying out of my game.

Really, this preference only matters for committed LTR girls - for MLTRs it doesn't matter too much.

But there are surely other reasons for this preference:

Evolutionary perspective: find a girl who has had little or no sex before – 1) because she isn’t already pregnant, and is less likely to have a STI; 2) past performance indicates future performance – if she has had casual sex before (from meet to sex in only a short time), she could do again – thus risking infidelity!

[yes, contraception does change this, but I don’t think it changes the preference].

And ultimately, no-one wants to buy a second hand car, right? A car that has been driven dozens of times (and driven heavily).

Thoughts welcome,

cheers

Anthony

Men always want to be a woman's first love - women like to be a man's last romance.
- Oscar Wilde


sinstyle.

Say's it all.

a nice spammer hahaha

amen to that.

I think this is an emotional thing that I can do little to help. A girl I'm seeing now told me 'you're only the 3rd guy I've slept with' honestly, it was music to my ears.

Anthony

Experience can be a good thing!

Ritz