London PUA, Experienced/Part time Coach
 

Sup guys. Not been on a forum in years, this should be fun.

Background-

Former International Chess player, reversed my 'social incompetence' in 2014 after a year reading self development and PUA theory.

-30-50 new lays a year since 2014, 3 open relationships (each better than the last), 20+ 3somes (3some hunting is my favourite part of game).

Coached clients for game and social development since 2016, 0 online advertisement because I can't take on more than 1-2 at a time and sadly have to recognise the social stigma PUAs have earned.

Game style- spread the vibes, you're winning if you're having fun and making others happier (preferably with the STRONG D).

HMU if you fancy gaming in East, my main wing of 5 years moved country and Im yet to find someone on his level.

Yeah, I'd be interested in meeting you, would be intriguing to see if you're as good as you claim, or are just talking complete bollocks.

To get those results, you must either be incredibly handsome with charisma to match, or your lays are mostly from night game with skanks.

That cool you want to meet me. I can see you wanted to delete your 'welcome' thread so don't know much about you or your experience. Can you give me a reason to meet you? Just doesn't seem appealing to prove myself to someone I know nothing about, ya get me?

Your second sentence raises to red flags, needing to be "incredibly handsome" to get good results (are you really telling me you havn't met guys in game who smash it that are average/underaverage looking...?). Also 'Skanks'... such an ugly word.

Roughly, the women I've developed sexual connections (:)) with are 35% daygame approaches, 35% numbers/Day2s from girls in nightgame, 15% SNLs with what you call "skanks" , 15% Tinder. Also, i'm a big fan of not 'fuck and chucking', sex gets better the more you have it with someone and increases chances of having a threesome with them!!!!

How about yourself?

Co-sign on not referring to girls from night game (or in general) as skanks.

The proportions here surprise me though. Like 30-50 new lays per year, 85% of them from basically doing day 2s, while still seeing other girls on the regular, plus going out days and evenings..This shit must take up a ton of your time.

Glad to see your co-sign, and that's a great quite in your signature!

I approach 1-2 people DG on my way to work and back, it's easy to get a couple dates per week just from that (minimal time investment)...and one night out on the weekend 8-12pm will normally lead to at least 1 day 2. My fwb's come to mine for 1-2 hours 3-4 times per week, definitely the most investment of time but they're all cool af.

Sooo an average month is 3-4 new girls, slow is 2, busy 6. Most has been 9, normally after a slow month where I've not pushed a pull with any of the dates and all the seeds grow into plants at once haha.

Dates are mostly coffees or non alcoholic drinks so cheap af, if I'm busy with other things I'll only have a date here and there... I love gaming and meeting new people so it doesnt ever feel laborious, I think that's key. Met a lot of people in the community who haven't got down the self amusement part of game, an ideal wing for me would be on point with that.

VibeSpreader those achievements sound impressive !

How long did it take you to reach your current level ?

Cheers Jello, I'm very happy with where I'm at which is why I get satisfaction coaching people to 'level up' their game.

I'd say it only took a few months of intense practice to be very competent at cold approach, and in turn constantly having new adventures/building relations at over 10 times the rate of what I previously had. It wasn't until my 3rd open relationship, my 6th year of gaming, until I realised the full extent of how possible it is to have consistant 3somes with a partner. The numbers of 'bi-curious' girls out there is insanely more high than I ever thought.

You sound perfect. I was doing what you did, though I must admit it was without the threesomes. I just got out of a relationship (long term) you could be perfect.