PUA Forums - The UK's Leading Pick-up Artist Forum

- General Chat (https://www.puaforums.co.uk/general-chat/)

- - Screening & Qualification. (https://www.puaforums.co.uk/general-chat/22009-screening-qualification.html)

Screening & Qualification.

Hi all, my first post in the Beginners Pick-Up sub-forum.

I'm interested in learning about screening women (in which I know it's a personal preference really and more approaching leads to more intuition) it's just I'm looking for a solid foundation of screening game/skillset I can apply to better discern the types of women I meet. Obviously, I'm aware that if they're not friendly, if they're cold or bitchy, that they have failed miserably (initially) as this is a no go for me. I wouldn't use the word receptive but lead to more open, warm, sincere and responsive women are a must for me. Beyond these first impressions, I'd like to be able to notice more about the person I'm meeting and less so superficially. Sure great looking women are on my screening list but I want to screen for personality, character, integrity and honesty. Is there any sources to increase this subset of game?

Qualification - Granted I must learn to screen first, I'm interested in Qualification (you know for quick lays). Can anyone run me through qualification game please?

:biggthumpup:

So really you're asking to filter out time wasters and girls who do not meet your standards to find girls who are dtf with you that night?

I'd agree with K's answers and definitions

Quote:

Originally Posted by kowalski (Post 99790)

Not sure how any of that will help you know for quick lays though. Quick lays happen when you've just met someone and you both are hot for each other and the logistics are right. It's pretty random whether you are going to come across someone appropriately available or not.

For me personally, if I'm going to spend a lot of time with somebody, then I worry about that person's qualities and our interactions.

If I want a definite shag, I'm less picky about personality and go more for a "throw enough shit and some of it will stick" approach with those to whom I am attracted. Essentially approach the girls who are receptive and see where it goes...

Quote:

Originally Posted by daleinthedark (Post 99792)

So really you're asking to filter out time wasters and girls who do not meet your standards to find girls who are dtf with you that night?

I'd agree with K's answers and definitions

For me personally, if I'm going to spend a lot of time with somebody, then I worry about that person's qualities and our interactions.

If I want a definite shag, I'm less picky about personality and go more for a "throw enough shit and some of it will stick" approach with those to whom I am attracted. Essentially approach the girls who are receptive and see where it goes...

I was always under the impression you could 'false-qualify' a woman you're interacting with to further progress the escalation towards becoming sexual. I was informed that you had to make her qualify herself to you and then you can escalate. I don't know the exact technique hence why I asked. I understand Adam Lyons had a product out on qualification. Maybe it was just marketing hype and once again is just a sub-skillset that makes up ones game.

If anyone could help clear this up for me?

:detective:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Temperance (Post 99831)

I was always under the impression you could 'false-qualify' a woman you're interacting with to further progress the escalation towards becoming sexual.

What does that even mean?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Temperance (Post 99831)

I was informed that you had to make her qualify herself to you and then you can escalate.

Why would she need to "qualify herself" to you in order to escalate?

You meet, she shows interest, you show interest. It's on and that simple