After heading out Friday night in Bristol, (for those of you interested in reading how the Bristol crew is developing go to
http://www.puaforum.co.uk/field-repo...good-show.html) one of the guys suggested the above topic.
I'm not going to name any names, but the guy I was talking with (admittedly we were both pissed after a night out) seemed abit disillusioned and was clearly unhappy with his performance despite me being impressed with what i'd seen and the potential within him.
Anyway from what I can gather (forgive me like I mentioned, we were talking at around 4.00am both quite drunk) he was suggesting that your game is irrelevant, there is only a natural order to things. I.e. if you are not genetically fortunate physically then girls naturally will not be attracted to you.
I personally do not agree with this, I think this is a victim mentality. If you have not been dealt a decent hand in the 'looks' department what are you supposed to do??.... Roll over and die?! FUCK THAT!!
I don't dispute that if you are a good-looking guy it gives you an edge, abit of a head start (remember though at school it was always the kids shit at sport given a head-start in a race??) but to say it's only the good-looking guys or guys with lots of £££ in their bank accounts get the best girls is madness!
I've heard time and time again by women that they always find attractive men to be boring (usually due to getting by on looks alone and so not having to develop a personality) and so they are generally not interested in them. This is an unhealthy perception to hold in itself, but a contrary belief to the topic of discussion.
So I thought i'd throw it out there into the forum for you guys to discuss, do you think there is a natural order to pick-up/attraction?? or is this purely an ignorant reality conjured up through social conditioning??