It has never even crossed my mind once to rate myself out of 10 in one girl's eyes in comparison to another, and why would I bother? At the end of the day I just wanna try get ALL of them out in order to fuck them.

If a girl tells you you're a five you're probably not fucking her right. Put it up her pooper, that'll turn that floppy five into a tight ten.

There's been loads of it, non of which validates your ego so you choose to ignore it. Not once have you demonstrated that you've taken anything on board. My last point stands more solidly.


I don't know, you tell me since that's what your doing.

You brought him up because you thought people had heard of him and that would give you social proof? That's weak.

Good, you shouldn't.

If the 9 is how you describe then I wouldn't be attracted to those qualities anyway, that disqualifies your whole point.

Broadsword broke it down great for you. Attraction is that simple, it really doesn't need the bells and whistles that you make out. It's like this;

I meet a cool girl - I like her.
We spend some time together and get on awesomely - I like her even more.
We spend even more time together and get on more awesomely - God forbid maybe I love her.

If those feelings in any of those situations are reciprocated then there will be mutual attraction. Of course if those feelings don't reciprocate each other at any of those stages the attraction will fade, you will know it and you will know its right to move on. There is no need for a 3 step method of 'flipping the switch', that is beta. Like I said your advice is.

You've accused me of being egotistical and stubborn and attribute those qualities to a supposed success with women. This is why your advice is dangerous.

You've been told multiple times of how 'this is shit, you could improve it by doing....' and you've chosen to ignore it each and every time.

I never said your motivations are monetary.

LOL "Phenomenon" - I really need to sort out he auto complete on my tablet.

It's obvious from the style of posts and consistency of thanks that these 2 are either the same person or know each other and have some kind of agenda, probably just to troll the forum.

I thought you wrote phenomenon on purpose & it was hilarious

Dangermouse goldstar point for you!



Watch This,

Hellcat x

buy my e-book

I can't be bothered to reply to every single word you said, cause it's too long, and 95% bullshit... but I'm in no way trying to fake social proof or whatever you think it is that I'm trying to do.. in what way is "I'm not trying to be Adam Lyons" doing that? Infact don't answer lol. Also, no, most of the advice has been shit "You're grooming" with no "I don't agree with this point, it makes you look ____ how about instead, you do something like this ____ to get your point across" etc.. just accusations of how I'm apparently trying to act a certain way or do a certain thing. Pretty much the only helpful advice has been from the guy who told me to read the book. He had good points, others are just trying to troll, or throwing around random accusations. I still stand by the point that you can be more attracted to one person than another, but maybe thats just me (and 99% of the planet) who knows. I won't be replying anymore, unless it's to something helpful.

Oh, 1 more thing, I don't know Hellcat. In what way am I trying to troll? I feel like I'm the only person here who isn't trolling, apart from that guy who suggested I read the book. Maybe Dan too, and a couple of others - a couple of good points have been made, but its been 95% "this is bad." with no advice.

You can't be bothered because your fragile ego can't take any form of opposition to your skewed beliefs on attraction. I reiterate you came here for an ego wank, kudos, pats on the back for your articles and you didn't get one and now everyone else is wrong and your right.

You admonish every piece of advice you've been given barring a book recommendation. You are socially blind. At least you've started to drop the backhanded passive aggressiveness, there's some semblance of progress.

'A negation is as good as an affirmation.' - Sigmund Freud

You brought him up because you believed people had heard of him. You wanted to align yourself with his name and his supposed success in the PUA industry and cash in on his social proof. But you didn't do your research and you didn't find out that someone like Adam Lyons isn't thought of too highly amongst many of the members here. When this became apparent you backtracked.

Truth hurts doesn't it.

No it hasn't. BroadswordWSJ and markuk gave you sound advice and you ignored it all. You're passive aggressiveness and inability to take any form of criticism speaks volumes about you're character. You want to be babied and mollycoddled.

I notice you're website contains no articles about approaching or dealing with approach anxiety. I bet this is because this area of dating has the potential for the most humiliation and your ego is terrified of humiliation. I bet you rarely even approach women.

No, people are offering you their thoughts and opinions since you asked for them in the first place. Hellcat is the only troll.

Is this because Doc Love tells you to believe that or is it because you have genuinely thought about this and believe it on your own?

And the passive aggressiveness is back.

Surprise, surprise the baby has spat his dummy out.


However on your advice I did some research on Doc Love like you recommended.

I believe this is him.


Here's an assortment of quotes I've found either from him or in relation to his practices.

Challenge is the most important reason that a woman is attracted to and chooses to stay in a relationship with one man over another

Challenge is defined as "allowing the woman to do the pursuing".

Doc Love's stated interest is to improve relationships between men and women, decrease the nation's divorce rate and gradually quell the 'war between the sexes'. He is highly critical of most self-acclaimed relationship experts who he criticizes as having no understanding of the concept of challenge and why women value it.

That last point is particularly revealing considering what you have written in your posts. You said yourself how you feel better qualified in the realm of relationships than in building attraction and dating. Your resistance to anything other than your already ingrained opinions is explained too.

It's my understanding Doc Love was originally a salesman. This goes a great way to understanding your resistance and skewed beliefs. When you were in a place of vulnerability you were drawn in by the snake oil salesman. Don't beat yourself up about it, progress can be made despite this.

I'm sure your a nice kid. It's just unfortunate the dating advice you have chosen to believe has come from a charlatan.