lol does the truth bother you? we live in a fucked up society because of all the pussies with their feelings who run it. Don't add to the problem.

Ugh, this is all over the place.

Truth is demonstrable. It's not demonstrably better to go to eastern europe to find women. That's anecdotal, subjective and there are way too many variables to account for to say that's objectively true. At best it's an opinion with a small amount of statistical evidence that might support it.

Even then, it's entirely possible to say nothing but facts and be socially retarded. If I go to a bus stop and scream facts about the periodic table at people, I am putting facts over feelings. It is also socially retarded

So fucking what? Does that make it a good idea to uproot and fucking emigrate to meet women? As if the fact that we have a higher obesity rate means it's easier to completely uproot your entire life than it is to find good looking women? It's not like there aren't tons of fit women in the UK. Isn't the whole point of getting good at game that you have the skills to pick up the women you want without having to resort to extreme shit like changing countries?

Common sense is subjective to a degree, but it's a heuristic term for what is generally seen as a the consensus of what is right or appropriate. To act like the general consensus of the reaction to this lines up with yours is obviously bullshit. In fact it's something you were tooting your own horn about a while ago, as if having an unpopular opinion somehow makes you correct by virtue of that in and of itself. It doesn't.


The are you on about? This isn't global warming or academic freedom we're talking about here. This isn't some battle of hearts and minds for the future of society. It's some PUAtard going on a frothy morning chat show to defend some passing comment he made about fat birds, and his advice about emigrating to get laid. What the fuck does that matter?

You seem to be under the impression that people on here think both you and gambler are being idiots because we're somehow on Piers Morgans side or offended by this. We aren't. Piers Morgan is a douche, and what Gambler said isn't offensive to anyone on here. What it is is socially tone-deaf, pointless, and damaging to his own brand.

What the absolute fuck are you babbling about?

The one truth I do know is that you & Gambler both speak complete shit.

He was asked to come on the show to talk about a particular subject. Not randomly state facts. This seems to have you confused.

I was simply agreeing with the general opinion. I'm not telling anyone to uproot lol.

You're not understanding. I agree it doesn't make someone right to have an unpopular opinion. Many popular opinions are (often) wrong which doesn't mean I'm saying all unpopular or unconventional ideas and opinions are right.

Free speech and talking the truth is actually about freedom and very important to society. Not to be shut down by a primitive bully like Morgan.

Try not to confuse your opinions with facts.

Most of your replies here come from you just jumping to conclusions about what you think someone else is thinking.

Your deliberately obscuring the point and going off on tangents again. It's like kowalski was saying with the non sequitur thing, it's fucking uncanny how you misconstrue everything. I'm not sure whether it's deliberate obscurantism or a lack of ability to follow any conversational thread at all, but not only have you driven this completely off the point of the thread, but you've sucked the fun out of this too. I'll be quick then.

Not the point. You said that you respect him because 'muh facts' and therefore it's not socially retarded. I responded with an analogy to show it was ridiculous. It still applies regardless of whether or not he was invited. Anyone with a hint of social sense can see the obvious reason why he was. So, again, socially retarded.

Not the point. Talking about Gambler, not you.

Not the point. You've implied, in this thread and before that there's inherent virtue in unpopular opinion. The popularity of positions is neutral, except when your entire job is teaching people how to interpret and react appropriately to social cues, and you do the exact opposite of the smart thing despite it being obvious why you shouldn't

Not the point. You can say what you like. Piers Morgans show gave him a platform to say what he liked. It's just a retarded opinion, and whether people agree or disagree with it has practically no bearing on the well-being of society as a whole.


Not the point. They aren't just my opinions. As was the point of the whole 'unpopular opinions' thing, they seem to be the consensus.

Don't suppose kowalski wants to tag in on this? He tends to be able to say with a "fuck off" what takes me a paragraph, tbh this shit stopped being fun half a page ago. Fell into the forum poe trap, it's like talking to Redemption all over again.

You're not getting this because you're confusing certain societal standards and pre programmed beliefs with reality. That's your reality not mine.

Was just having a random nosey on companies house looking at the financial health of a few businesses I'm interested in and typed in PUA TRAINING out of intrigue...

The company was dissolved on the 4th of November 2017

I'm not laughing at someone going out of business but the fact that PUA was marketed as this big massive ground-breaking revolution. Yet it's hey-days are over.

The balance sheets they have on the website are tricky to make full sense of but it looks to me like he barely ever made any money out of it. Maybe on the 2014 one 96k but again it's difficult to read these even though I've got a fucking diploma in this shit. Maybe someone else who's fully qualified could shed more light on it.

https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/c...history?page=1